Unauthorized charge: what is your right, and what do you do?

The Debit Cards Law, 5746-1986 was repealed on 14 October 2020, and the Payment Services Law, 5779-2019 applies in its place (sections 55 and 77). Under this Law, from the moment you give notice of the misuse you are not liable for further charges, and before the notice your liability is limited: at most NIS 75 plus NIS 30 for each day from the time you found out until the notice, and no more than NIS 450 if you gave notice within 30 days of the first use (section 24(c)). The limit does not apply if you made the essential component of the payment instrument available to another person or acted fraudulently (sections 24(d) and 26). Beyond that, you bear no liability (section 31).

What to do at once:

The law has no “13-month window”. What decides is when you gave notice: after the notice you are not liable at all, and before it you are liable for at most NIS 75 plus NIS 30 for each day from the time you found out until the notice, and no more than NIS 450 if you gave notice within 30 days of the first use (Payment Services Law, section 24(c)). For a charge that has no signed document or record of strong authentication, you must give notice within 30 days of receiving the notice of the charge (section 29(b)).

When is a payment platform responsible for a charge that was reversed, and not only the credit card company?

The credit card company refunds the money to you (section 27 of the Payment Services Law), and sometimes collects it from the business that received the payment, but not when strong authentication was used in the transaction, or when such authentication was not possible or not allowed to the business (section 32(a)). But there are cases in which the platform itself (an e-commerce shop, a payment app, a fintech company) bears additional liability.

Duties to identify the customer and to report to the Israel Money Laundering and Terror Financing Prohibition Authority are imposed by the Prohibition on Money Laundering Law, 5760-2000 (חוק איסור הלבנת הון, התש״ס-2000) on banking corporations and on the financial bodies in the Third Schedule to the Law, including payment companies, under orders issued under section 7. The Payment Services Law, 5779-2019 empowers the Minister of Justice to set duties to verify the payer’s identity (section 10).

If the platform did not meet its duties and you suffered damage as a result, you may have a direct cause of action against it in tort law, alongside your rights against the issuer of the payment instrument. This question is examined according to the circumstances of the case. It is especially relevant in sophisticated frauds that a reasonable platform should have stopped.

Who is responsible for money stolen in a phishing scam: the bank, the customer or the platform?

The rule in the Payment Services Law, 5779-2019 is not a negligence test. For misuse that took place before you notified the bank or the credit card company, you are liable at most for a limited amount: NIS 75 plus NIS 30 for each day from the time you found out until the notice, and no more than NIS 450 if you gave notice within 30 days of the first use (section 24(c)). For use after the notice, you are not liable at all (section 24(b)). The limit does not apply if you made the essential component of the payment instrument available to another person, or if you acted fraudulently (sections 24(d) and 26). According to an opinion of the Ministry of Justice (30 September 2021), giving details to someone who impersonated the bank or the credit card company does not fall within this exception.

If the bank believes that one of the exceptions applies, it may charge you again only after a written notice with reasons, as a rule at least 15 days before the charge (section 27(b)), and in a dispute about this the court decides. Get legal advice before you accept a refusal by the bank as final.

Do you run a business and want to check what the law requires of it?I will get back to you within one business day.

Calls and replies in English or Hebrew

What happens after you write to me

  1. You write what happened and with whom. No documents.
  2. I get back to you within one business day for a short call of a few minutes.
  3. If it is a matter I handle: after the call you will receive, in writing, what will be done and what the next step is. Work starts only after you approve.

At the end of the call you will know one of three things: it is a matter I handle, and what the next step is; you can manage without a lawyer, and which guide fits; or it is outside my field, and where to turn.

What duties does Israeli law place on fintech platforms and businesses that accept online payments?

Businesses that accept payments online (shops, fintech companies, apps) are subject to duties that protect you as consumers, some of them only if they are regulated financial bodies:

What do you do if the bank or the credit card company refuses?

There are several steps:

Sources

The links lead to the original legislation (in Hebrew). The binding text is the one published in Sefer HaHukim (the official gazette of statutes).

Has something similar happened to you?You can write to me what happened and with whom, without documents.

Calls and replies in English or Hebrew

Checklist

  • Practical tip: in claims against fintech platforms, check their terms of use. Many companies try to limit liability to negligible amounts. The provisions of the Payment Services Law cannot be contracted out of except in the customer’s favor (section 51(a)), and a term in a standard-form contract that exempts the supplier from liability that the law would have imposed on it is presumed to be unfair (section 4(1) of the Standard Contracts Law, 5743-1982).
  • Relevant legislation: Payment Services Law, 5779-2019 (which repealed the Debit Cards Law, 5746-1986 with effect from 14 October 2020); Prohibition on Money Laundering Law, 5760-2000; Standard Contracts Law, 5743-1982; Protection of Privacy Regulations (Data Security), 5777-2017.
  • Common mistake: dealing only with the specific charge and not examining indirect damage: loss of credit standing, costs of repair and recovery, emotional distress. In large claims, the indirect damage sometimes exceeds the original transaction.
  • Tactical point: consider a class action when there is a recurring pattern: a platform that allowed repeated frauds by the same method, with many victims.
Legal note: The information in this guide is general and is not legal advice or a substitute for advice on your own case. Every case is assessed on its own facts.