An employee with a disability who asked for an ergonomic chair and was told “there is no budget” does not have to accept that. An employee with a visual impairment who is required to use software without adapted support may have a cause of action. The Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities Law requires employers to make accommodations, and an employer who refuses without justification is actually breaking the law.

Who has the duty to make accommodations for an employee with a disability, and what does it include?

The Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities Law, 5758-1998 requires an employer of six or more employees to make “accommodations” for employees and candidates with disabilities, as long as the accommodation does not impose an “undue burden” on it (section 8(e)). The prohibition of discrimination and the duty to make accommodations apply to an employer of six or more employees: the employment chapter of the Law does not apply to someone who employs fewer than six employees (section 13(a) of the Law, which applies section 21(c) of the Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law). The duty to act to promote suitable representation (section 9) is limited to employers of more than 25 employees.

Accommodations are needed not only in hiring but throughout the employment relationship: in the terms of employment, in the physical environment and in the work tools.

Which disabilities does the Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities Law cover?

The Law defines a “person with a disability” as a person with a physical, mental or intellectual impairment, including a cognitive one, permanent or temporary, because of which their functioning is substantially limited in one or more of the main areas of life (section 5). When this condition is met, the definition can include:

The critical point: a disability that is not visible is also covered. An employee with severe depression who was dismissed without regard to their condition is protected exactly like an employee who comes to work in a wheelchair. The prohibition also applies to someone who was a person with a disability in the past, to someone who is regarded as a person with a disability, and to family members who care for them (section 8(d)).

What exactly is prohibited under the ban on disability discrimination at work?

Section 8 of the Law prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability at every stage of employment:

Note: the prohibition also applies when the disability is only one of the considerations in the decision. And in a claim about a dismissal, if the employee proved that there was no reason for the dismissal in their conduct or actions, the burden shifts to the employer to prove that it did not discriminate (section 13, which applies section 9(a) of the Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law).

What counts as a reasonable accommodation for an employee with a disability?

Physical: an adapted ergonomic chair, an accessible ramp, parking close to the entrance, accessible toilets, moving to the ground floor.

In work tools: software with support for people with low vision, large screens, adapted keyboards.

In schedules: flexible hours for a person with a disability that requires frequent treatments, partial work from home.

In the role: changing the division of tasks so that unsuitable tasks are passed to others.

Are you an employer who wants to check what the law requires of you?I will get back to you within one business day.

Calls and replies in English or Hebrew

What happens after you write to me

  1. You write what happened and with whom. No documents.
  2. I get back to you within one business day for a short call of a few minutes.
  3. If it is a matter I handle: after the call you will receive, in writing, what will be done and what the next step is. Work starts only after you approve.

At the end of the call you will know one of three things: it is a matter I handle, and what the next step is; you can manage without a lawyer, and which guide fits; or it is outside my field, and where to turn.

When is an accommodation for an employee with a disability considered an undue burden on the employer?

The term in the Law is “undue burden”: a burden that is unreasonable in the circumstances, taking into account, among other things, the cost and nature of the accommodation, the size and structure of the business, the scope of its activity, the number of employees, the composition of the workforce, and the existence of external or state sources of funding for the accommodation (section 8(e)).

So the same accommodation may be reasonable in a large company and be considered an undue burden in a small business, and the state even participates in funding accommodations under regulations made under section 17(b) of the Law.

What happens when an employer refuses to make an accommodation for an employee with a disability? Refusing a reasonable accommodation is discrimination on the grounds of disability, a civil wrong (tort) for which you can sue. In addition, you can apply to the Commission for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which may also file a claim in its own name or in the name of the employee, with the employee’s consent (section 12).

Disability and dismissal: what is your protection?

Beyond accommodations, an employee with a disability is protected from dismissal because of their disability. Dismissing an employee who is fit for the job because of a disability is prohibited (section 8(a)(5)), and failing to make accommodations that would have allowed their continued employment is itself discrimination (section 8(e)). Employers who dismiss an employee with a disability “because we cannot make accommodations”, when there are alternatives that were not examined, risk a claim.

Duties of suitable representation in the public sector

An employer of more than 25 employees who sees that persons with disabilities are not suitably represented among its employees must act to promote suitable representation, including by making accommodations (section 9). At a large public employer, meaning a public body or a government company that employs at least 100 employees, representation is not deemed suitable unless at least 5% of its employees are employees with a significant disability (section 9B(b)). A separate arrangement applies to government ministries (section 15A of the Civil Service (Appointments) Law, 5719-1959 (חוק שירות המדינה (מינויים), התשי״ט-1959)).

What is the sanction for breaching the Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities Law at work?

An employee who suffered discrimination can go to the Labor Court and sue for compensation, even without proof of monetary damage, in an amount the court sees fit; the Law does not set a cap on this compensation (section 14(1)). A civil claim becomes time-barred within five years of the day the cause of action arose, and a claim by a job seeker within three years (section 13, which applies section 14 of the Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law). In addition, if compensation alone would not be just, the court may give a prohibitory injunction or a mandatory order (section 14(2)), for example:

A class action is possible on a cause of action under the employment chapter of the Law (item 9 of the Second Schedule to the Class Actions Law, 5766-2006). Under the conditions in section 12, a claim under the chapter may also be filed by the workers’ organization (trade union), by an organization that works to promote the rights of persons with disabilities, with the employee’s consent, and by the Commission for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Has something similar happened to you?You can write to me what happened and with whom, without documents.

Calls and replies in English or Hebrew

What to do now: a practical guide for employers

If you are an employer and want to act correctly:

Employees and candidates: what to collect when you suspect discrimination

The list is built on what needs to be shown in a claim under Chapter D of the Law:

Sources

The links lead to the original legislation (in Hebrew). The binding text is the one published in Sefer HaHukim (the official gazette of statutes).

Checklist

  • Practical tip: when representing clients with disabilities, always ask for a written record of every accommodation request that was submitted and of the employer’s answer. Written evidence of a refusal without a reason is very important in a claim.
  • Relevant legislation: section 8(e) of the Law treats failure to make accommodations as discrimination, and weighs the “undue burden” by, among other things, external or state sources of funding; see also the Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities (State Participation in Funding Accommodations) Regulations, 5766-2006 (תקנות שוויון זכויות לאנשים עם מוגבלות (השתתפות המדינה במימון התאמות), התשס״ו-2006).
  • Common mistake: assuming that the duty to make accommodations applies only to large employers. It applies to every employer of six or more employees (section 13 of the Law, which applies section 21(c) of the Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law); beyond that, the size of the business is weighed in the question of whether the accommodation imposes an “undue burden”, and a threshold of more than 25 employees is set for the duty of suitable representation (section 9).
  • Tactical point: if the employer argues an “undue burden”, ask for discovery of information about its accessibility budget and about accommodations it made for other employees. Such information may reveal inconsistency in handling.
Legal note: The information in this guide is general and is not legal advice or a substitute for advice on your own case. Every case is assessed on its own facts.